January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
Melendres Parties | Grissom Matter | Misc Other
Arpaio-Zullo Cold Case Posse/Birther Investigation | Seattle Operation | Dennis Montgomery*
*Note: For information on 2008 Dennis Montgomery litigation-related events that are unrelated to Melendres, see here.
Jan. 3, 2008
Maricopa County/Arpaio file Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss. ECF 12.
Jan. 4, 2008
Maricopa County/Arpaio file ANSWER to Complaint. ECF 13.
Jan. 21, 2008
Melendres Plaintiffs file Opposition to Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion (12) to Dismiss Case. ECF 14.
February
March
April
May
June
Jul. 16, 2008
Melendres Plaintiffs file Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint (ECF 17) and lodge Proposed First Amended Complaint (ECF 18).
Jul. 28, 2008
Maricopa County/Arpaio file Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion (17) to Amend/Correct Complaint. ECF 19.
Aug. 7, 2008
Melendres Plaintiffs file Reply in Support of Motion (17) to Amend/Correct Complaint. ECF 20.
Aug. 29, 2008
Judge Murguia issues minute order: “The Court ORDERS setting this matter for oral argument re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [12] and Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint [17] on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 3:30 p.m. before Judge Mary H Murguia.” ECF 23.
Sep. 3, 2008
MOTION to Intervene filed by “Aggrieved and Irreparably Injured Class of United States and Phoenix Citizens.” ECF 24.
Sep. 5, 2008
Judge Murguia issues order: “granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [ECF 17]”; “denying Defendants 12 (b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [ECF 12] as moot;” and “vacating the Motion Hearing set on September 24, 2008 at 3:30 p.m. ECF 25.
Melendres Plaintiffs file FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, and Maricopa County. ECF 26 (PDF).
Sep. 23, 2008
Melendres Plaintiffs file Opposition to Motion (24) to Intervene. ECF 30.
Sep. 24, 2008
Maricopa County/MCSO/Arpaio file Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages for Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (ECF 31) and lodge proposed Motion (ECF 32).
Sep. 29, 2008
Judge Murguia issues order granting Defendants Motion (31) for leave to “file their Reply memorandum in a form not to exceed twenty (20) pages.” ECF 36.
Maricopa County/MCSO/Arpaio file Joinder in Plaintiffs’ Opposition (30) to Motion (24) to Intervene. ECF 37.
Maricopa County/MCSO/Arpaio file Rule 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. ECCF 39.
Sep. 30, 2008
Judge Murguia issues order “denying Bill Stoller and the Aggrieved and Irreparably Injured Class of United States and Phoenix Citizens' Motion [24] to Intervene Under Rule 22 and24 Fed. R. Civ. P. Motion to Intervene. ECF 38 (PDF).
Oct. 6, 2008
Motion for rehearing of Motion (24) to intervene is filed. ECF 42. (Notice of appeal and other related docs filed as well.)
Oct. 14, 2008
Judge Murguia issues order denying Motion (42) for reconsideration of order (38) denying Motion (24) to intervene: ” Motions for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) are disfavored and only appropriate if the court "(1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." School Sist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. Acands, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2742 (1994). Having considered Stoller's request, the Court denies the Motion. No new evidence has been presented, the law regarding intervention remains stable and, because Stollers attempt to intervene lacks all merit, the previous Order could in no sense be considered manifestly unjust. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Stollers Motion for Rehearing And Resubmission of Motion to Intervene. (Dkt.#42.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Parties that a stay will not be issued during the pendency of appeal and the case shall proceed as scheduled.”
Melendres Plaintiffs file Opposition to Defendants’ Motion (39) to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. ECF 48.
Melendres Plaintiffs file Motion for Hearing or Conference re: Rule 16 Conference. ECF 49.
Oct. 23, 2008
Maricopa County/MCSO/Arpaio file Response to Motion (49) for Hearing or Conference re: Rule 16 Conference. ECF 52.
Nov. 3, 2008
Melendres Plaintiffs file Reply in Support of Motion (49) for Hearing or Conference re: Rule 16 Conference. ECF 54.
December
| « 2007 |
2009 »
|
| Be notified of page updates |
Comments