Did Obama Lie on his Illinois ARDC Lawyer Registration Form?

As outlined in more detail below, Mr. Philip A. Berg alleges, in his lawsuit against Obama, that Obama lied to the Illinois Supreme Court in his Attorney Registration filing. (Note:  Berg's complaint has been dismissed, but he is appealing in both the Third Circuit and the Supreme Court.  See here for current status of his appeals.)

So, the question is, what's the evidence to support these allegations? 

(Note:  If you are aware of additional evidence, that either supports or refuts the allegations, please submit it through a Comment, and we will update this information accordingly! Thank you!)

Let's break the allegations down:

Allegation		Pleading Citation(s)	Evidence Cited in Pleadings
A	"Further investigation led to Obama's State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record."	Complaint ¶ 36; see also TRO Memo at 8.	None
B	"On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it specifically asks for 'Full former name(s).'"	Id.	None
C	"Obama put 'None,' when in fact he went by the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama."	Id.	None
D	"It is further believed Obama has used the name Barry Dunham."	Id.	None
E	"Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the penalty of perjury."	Id.	None

Analysis of "Evidence" Available on the Internet

A	"Further investigation led to Obama's State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record."
What's Your Evidence?		Citation	Notes
Unk?	Apparently, Berg's "investigation" involved internet research leading him to this claim made by several (anonymous) bloggers.	See Obama failed to list other names he has used on his Illinois ARC registration, available on Berg's website.	See Conclusion.
Conclusion: Unable to verify extent of investigation, but apparently inadequate.
As noted above, it appears that Berg did not undertake a reasonable investigation into the allegations raised by various, mostly anonymous bloggers.

Back to Top

B	"On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it specifically asks for 'Full former name(s).'"
What's Your Evidence?		Citation	Notes
Unk?	Berg cites a printout of the results obtained from a search for "Barack Obama" in the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois (ARDC-IL).	See Obama failed to list other names he has used on his Illinois ARC registration.	See Conclusion.
False	However, Berg inaccurately claims that the form "asks" for "full former name(s).    In fact, the form displays full former name(s) reported by the attorney: "ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of August 26, 2008 at 12:36:02 PM:"	See ARDC-IL, Attorney Search Results for Barack Obama.	See Conclusion.
	As explained by the ARDC-IL, (a) the "Full Licensed Name" displays the current name under which the attorney is licensed in Illinois; and (b) the "Full Former Name(s) displays any former names under which the attorney was licenced to practice law in Illinois:  "The ARDC master roll of registered attorneys lists a lawyer's name in the same manner as the name appears on the roll of attorneys. The roll of attorneys is a list of all attorneys admitted to practice of law in Illinois. ... A lawyer's name on the Clerk's roll of attorneys is the name under which the lawyer was admitted to the practice of law in Illinois or, if any name changes have been allowed by the Court, the most recent such change." 8/27 Update:  The Illinois ARDC Clerk's Office confirms that The Former Names Field contains only the name(s) of the person previously listed on the Illinois Master Roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois; and The Former Names Field does not refer to any name(s) adopted prior to becoming licensed to practice law in Illinois; nor does it refer to any informal names used by the attorney at issue.	See ARDC-IL, Lawyer Registration - Request for Name Change. 8/27 Update:  See also "Dissecting, and Refuting, Philip Berg's Perjury Claim," AmericasRight.com	See Conclusion.
	Stated another way, if Alice Attorney gets married (or divorced) and changes her name to Alice Lawyer *after* she's admitted into practice, then she must file a name change with the Illinois Supreme Court. Her prior name -- i.e., the name under which she was admitted -- will show up as a former name. To see this, conduct a search for Michelle Obama - a perfect example - here: the ARDC search for Michelle Obama provides a perfect example of this fact. Her results are as follows: Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson	See ARDC-IL, Attorney Search Results for Michelle Obama.  8/27 Update:  See also "Dissecting, and Refuting, Philip Berg's Perjury Claim," AmericasRight.com	See Conclusion.
Conclusion: False; Direct Evidence Contradicts Allegation
Berg's allegation is, quite simply, false. The screenshot produced on his website is a public record of Obama's public ARDC information.  Berg has provided no evidence to support his allegation that Barack had any former legal names. Even assuming facts not in evidence - i.e., that Barack actually had former legal names, Berg has provided no evidence to support his allegation that Barack failed to disclose them to the Illinois Supreme Court.  The ARDC simply does not reflect such information. The ARDC Register website makes clear that the names listed on the attorney register are names under which the person was licenced to practice law in Illinois. To clarify: Assuming that Barack (a) had a different legal name, and -- to take it further, assuming that (b) he disclosed that legal name on his application for admission to the bar, that name would NOT show up on the Lawyer Register website. The purpose of the Lawyer Register is for citizens to be able to search for lawyers and to see, e.g, if they've ever been subject to discipline by the Bar. Thus, if a person practiced under a different name, that other name must be disclosed. (Otherwise, a person who was disciplined could avoid "disclosure" simply by changing his/her name.) Thus, what shows up on the Lawyer Register website is other names that the attorney used during the practice of law. In short, on the issue of whether Obama, assuming he had a different name, disclosed any such different name on his Illinois Bar Application, the screenshot of Obama's record in the Illinois Lawyer Register on Berg's website provides no evidence of that fact one way or the other.

Back to Top

C	"Obama put 'None,' when in fact he went by the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama."
What's Your Evidence?		Citation	Notes
False	See B, above for both Berg's "evidence" and the facts directly refuting Berg's evidence.	See B, above.	See Conclusion.
Conclusion: False; Direct Evidence Contradicts Allegation
See B, above.

Back to Top

D	"It is further believed Obama has used the name Barry Dunham."
What's Your Evidence?		Citation	Notes
False	None.	None.	See Conclusion.
Conclusion: Likely False; Not Supported by Any Verifiable Facts
Many blogs refer to Barack Obama as "Barry Durham," but no article has been located containing facts/evidence indicating that Obama actually adopted the legal name of "Barry Dunham."

Back to Top

E	"Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the penalty of perjury."
What's Your Evidence?		Citation	Notes
False	See B, above for both Berg's "evidence" and the facts directly refuting Berg's evidence.	See B, above.	See Conclusion.
Conclusion: False; Direct Evidence Contradicts Allegation
See B, above. 9/23 Update:  This conclusion section previously contained an analogy to illustrate a logical problem with Berg's argument.  However, it has been reported to us that Berg and/or his representatives misunderstood the analogy to be an allegation of improper conduct against Berg.  It was in no manner intended as such.  Therefore, we have removed the analogy to prevent any other readers from misunderstanding the point. We generally make our corrections in "markup"/via strikethrough; however, given that reported misunderstanding of the text, we are deleting the comment in its entirety, to ensure that no one else makes that mistake.

Back to Top